Back to the complete issue
Friday, 6 January 2017

Moral dilemma in badminton match

The most paradoxical and upside down badminton match of all time: At the 2012 London Olympics, women’s badminton doubles teams from China and Korea wanted to avoid playing the world champions in the knockout stages. So in the last match of their group stages, both guaranteed to progress, the teams played and competed to lose, putting on show quite possibly the worst badminton match ever. Radiolab’s producers discussed the ethics of what the teams did, raising a number of questions. They asked if the definition of ethics in sport “to win”? Yes, we can all agree to that, but does mean winning every point possible? No, not necessarily, one could argue, as teams even drop individual matches in attempt to win tournaments. This leaves us with a moral dilemma: if we want hyper-competitive players who want to win it at all cost, then that is what we got exactly with the 2012 badminton match, they were playing in a way that gave them the best chance to win the overall championship.

You can watch the games “highlights” here (runtime 05:03). And for the record: Both teams were disqualified from the 2012 Olympics (runtime 26:25).

Enterprise is a daily publication of Enterprise Ventures LLC, an Egyptian limited liability company (commercial register 83594), and a subsidiary of Inktank Communications. Summaries are intended for guidance only and are provided on an as-is basis; kindly refer to the source article in its original language prior to undertaking any action. Neither Enterprise Ventures nor its staff assume any responsibility or liability for the accuracy of the information contained in this publication, whether in the form of summaries or analysis. © 2022 Enterprise Ventures LLC.

Enterprise is available without charge thanks to the generous support of HSBC Egypt (tax ID: 204-901-715), the leading corporate and retail lender in Egypt; EFG Hermes (tax ID: 200-178-385), the leading financial services corporation in frontier emerging markets; SODIC (tax ID: 212-168-002), a leading Egyptian real estate developer; SomaBay (tax ID: 204-903-300), our Red Sea holiday partner; Infinity (tax ID: 474-939-359), the ultimate way to power cities, industries, and homes directly from nature right here in Egypt; CIRA (tax ID: 200-069-608), the leading providers of K-12 and higher level education in Egypt; Orascom Construction (tax ID: 229-988-806), the leading construction and engineering company building infrastructure in Egypt and abroad; Moharram & Partners (tax ID: 616-112-459), the leading public policy and government affairs partner; Palm Hills Developments (tax ID: 432-737-014), a leading developer of commercial and residential properties; Mashreq (tax ID: 204-898-862), the MENA region’s leading homegrown personal and digital bank; Industrial Development Group (IDG) (tax ID:266-965-253), the leading builder of industrial parks in Egypt; Hassan Allam Properties (tax ID:  553-096-567), one of Egypt’s most prominent and leading builders; and Saleh, Barsoum & Abdel Aziz (tax ID: 220-002-827), the leading audit, tax and accounting firm in Egypt.