Back to the complete issue
Friday, 12 August 2016

Time scientists fight over keeping a leap second

What time is it anyway? While Egypt’s parliament deliberated over the summer whether to have daylight savings, time scientists across the world are locked in a struggle of whether to have a leap second. Yes, leap seconds are actually a thing. Measuring time during the day has always been based on the earth’s position relative to the sun on its daily axis around itself. Apparently that axis rotation has been slowing down as the tides that hit the world’s beaches takes energy out of its spin, allowing down the earth. The world’s keepers of the true accuracy of time, dubbed “time masters”, use an atomic clock to measure atomic time: 9.2 billion oscillations of a microwave beam, when tuned to the frequency of a caesium atom, roughly the equivalent to the 86,400 seconds of the day. The effects of the tide on the earth’s rotation makes it several mn times less stable than the caesium atom. In order to correct the discrepancy between the two, time masters have allowed on several occasions to hold time still at 00.00.00 for one second, called a leap second. This is has happened every other year or so since 1972, according to The Economist’s 1843 magazine.

Why would should we care? These measurements govern the world’s standard time relied upon by global positioning satellites silently travelling, planes for flying, computers for talking to each other and trading in the global markets. Sometimes not everyone gets the memo, causing glitches such as on 30 June 2015, where some financial markets chose to close for a minute, while services at Amazon, Apple, Netflix and Twitter were disrupted. The danger is more acute for global finance in light of the prevalence of high frequency trading, when a second can affect time between when an order is placed and when it is executed. When beating the competition by fractions of a second becomes crucial, a disruption that small could mess up the order of trades. Time scientists fighting for eliminating the leap year argue that the shifts would cause damages of Y2K proportions. They claim that the leap year is a throwback to when the world was much less interconnected, accusing proponents of holding on to archaic Victorian notions where Britain determined the standard. This argument is helped by the UK’s time masters leading the fight to retain the leap year, who dismiss their opponents concerns as sensationalist. Expect an extra second this year at 23:59:60 on 31 December, according to New Scientist.

Enterprise is a daily publication of Enterprise Ventures LLC, an Egyptian limited liability company (commercial register 83594), and a subsidiary of Inktank Communications. Summaries are intended for guidance only and are provided on an as-is basis; kindly refer to the source article in its original language prior to undertaking any action. Neither Enterprise Ventures nor its staff assume any responsibility or liability for the accuracy of the information contained in this publication, whether in the form of summaries or analysis. © 2022 Enterprise Ventures LLC.

Enterprise is available without charge thanks to the generous support of HSBC Egypt (tax ID: 204-901-715), the leading corporate and retail lender in Egypt; EFG Hermes (tax ID: 200-178-385), the leading financial services corporation in frontier emerging markets; SODIC (tax ID: 212-168-002), a leading Egyptian real estate developer; SomaBay (tax ID: 204-903-300), our Red Sea holiday partner; Infinity (tax ID: 474-939-359), the ultimate way to power cities, industries, and homes directly from nature right here in Egypt; CIRA (tax ID: 200-069-608), the leading providers of K-12 and higher level education in Egypt; Orascom Construction (tax ID: 229-988-806), the leading construction and engineering company building infrastructure in Egypt and abroad; Moharram & Partners (tax ID: 616-112-459), the leading public policy and government affairs partner; Palm Hills Developments (tax ID: 432-737-014), a leading developer of commercial and residential properties; Mashreq (tax ID: 204-898-862), the MENA region’s leading homegrown personal and digital bank; Industrial Development Group (IDG) (tax ID:266-965-253), the leading builder of industrial parks in Egypt; Hassan Allam Properties (tax ID:  553-096-567), one of Egypt’s most prominent and leading builders; and Saleh, Barsoum & Abdel Aziz (tax ID: 220-002-827), the leading audit, tax and accounting firm in Egypt.