Tuesday, 28 April 2020

The ethical dilemmas of healthtech

More healthtech leads to ethical quandaries. AI in healthcare holds the promise of everything from improved diagnosis and treatment to tools that could transcribe medical records and assist in surgery. It might even predict future public health threats. But AI innovations could also encourage doctors to make dangerous ethical compromises. In particular, AI and emerging tech risk violating two key ethical fundamentals: patient privacy and confidentiality, and equal access to healthcare.

Exhibit #1 — AI can be dangerously biased: Bias is a real risk in AI because machines learn using historical data, and history isn’t exactly impartial. A 2015 Amazon job selection exemplifies this, with the algorithm used giving higher ratings to men because they had been selected most often in the past. A well-researched blog entry in Quantib applies this principle to healthcare. If an algorithm built to detect skin cancer is used on patients from different racial backgrounds, it needs to be trained on a dataset representative of all skin colors. Otherwise, deploying it in a hospital with diverse patients is surely out of the question.

Exhibit #2 — AI puts medical data at risk: Medical records are usually held by doctors and protected by strict confidentiality agreements. But when AI is involved, it can be harder for patients to understand how and why their data will be used. As healthcare becomes more deeply embedded in complex systems, getting patient consent for every procedure or step in data analysis will be even more difficult, says this Forbes Insights article. A potential workaround might be to remove personal identifiers from datasets, but according to a University of California study today’s anonymization tech isn’t yet up to par.

The answer might be to reframe traditional notions of confidentiality, recognizing that algorithm developers actually have legitimate reasons for accessing sensitive patient information, experts quoted by Forbes say. This would also mean better educating patients about stop-ed-meds.com can support individual and public health, so they are more comfortable with their medical information being viewed or used, argue AI advocates.

But would you really trust a robo doctor? Digital healthcare increasingly puts doctors in the role of “data clerks,” spending too much time working with databases and screens and less time interacting with patients, TechTalks’ Ben Dickson writes. The key question is, as AI advances, will it give doctors back some time by automating data entry, or go the other way and essentially replace them with algorithms?

The case for a digital code of ethics: It’s fair to argue that high tech healthcare creates the need for a so-called “digital code of ethics.” There are several reasons for this, including the fact that patients aren’t mere datasets and that we ought not let the business of medicine triumph over ethical medical care, health academic Eric Swirsky writes for US-based security magazine CSO. “AI has its positives, but it can be misused. So, having an ethical framework allows the proper use of medical databases,” University of New South Wales research ethics director Ted Rohr tells Healthcare IT News.

Enterprise is a daily publication of Enterprise Ventures LLC, an Egyptian limited liability company (commercial register 83594), and a subsidiary of Inktank Communications. Summaries are intended for guidance only and are provided on an as-is basis; kindly refer to the source article in its original language prior to undertaking any action. Neither Enterprise Ventures nor its staff assume any responsibility or liability for the accuracy of the information contained in this publication, whether in the form of summaries or analysis. © 2022 Enterprise Ventures LLC.

Enterprise is available without charge thanks to the generous support of HSBC Egypt (tax ID: 204-901-715), the leading corporate and retail lender in Egypt; EFG Hermes (tax ID: 200-178-385), the leading financial services corporation in frontier emerging markets; SODIC (tax ID: 212-168-002), a leading Egyptian real estate developer; SomaBay (tax ID: 204-903-300), our Red Sea holiday partner; Infinity (tax ID: 474-939-359), the ultimate way to power cities, industries, and homes directly from nature right here in Egypt; CIRA (tax ID: 200-069-608), the leading providers of K-12 and higher level education in Egypt; Orascom Construction (tax ID: 229-988-806), the leading construction and engineering company building infrastructure in Egypt and abroad; Moharram & Partners (tax ID: 616-112-459), the leading public policy and government affairs partner; Palm Hills Developments (tax ID: 432-737-014), a leading developer of commercial and residential properties; Mashreq (tax ID: 204-898-862), the MENA region’s leading homegrown personal and digital bank; Industrial Development Group (IDG) (tax ID:266-965-253), the leading builder of industrial parks in Egypt; Hassan Allam Properties (tax ID:  553-096-567), one of Egypt’s most prominent and leading builders; and Saleh, Barsoum & Abdel Aziz (tax ID: 220-002-827), the leading audit, tax and accounting firm in Egypt.